Pfsense fq codel. C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0.
Pfsense fq codel Warnings about it being obsolete not withstanding. @jonathanlee Thank you very much for this attempt. 2-CE ISO with limiter created for up- and download. The default is 10240. 910 Mbit/s 0 ms burst 0 q65538 50 sl. 4. CoDel is not configurable using the wizard, but it does not require complex setup: Navigate to Firewall > Traffic Shaper, By Interface tab. 2 installation (VM on Proxmox using the legacy ISO) create (FQ_CODEL) limiter according to the pfSense documentation "Configuring CoDel Limiters for Bufferbloat" confirm the limiter is working; change the scheduler for the download and upload pipe to "FQ_PIE" Some PFsense fq_codel users are perpetually reporting problems with icmp and other traffic that I don’t know the root cause of. 01 with limiters + FQ-Codel configured. 168. Without CODEL and FQ_CODEL I get 250mbps. I have four limiters set, upload and download for LAN and guest. The queue lengths are: I have a suspicion that its FQ_CODEL related, but thas just a suspicion. 0. Then I added Floating Rules to use them (I skipped two FQ-CoDel limit doesn't really need messed with, this setting defines the maximum number of packets that CAN be queued. Others aren’t. With 22. 3 Part 9: Traffic Shaper. inet. Using FQ_PIE, FQ_CODEL, and the worst-case weighted fair, iperf traffic was limited to the 100 Mb/s cap I set in the Before FQ-Codel I was often getting 10-15% higher numbers from dslreports, but with bad buffer bloat. 5. Status: Setting the delay on the limiter to 1ms and net. I run a very decently spec'd PC that would in no way bottle neck. - Cause codel can also be used as just a way how to let packets drop if a pipe gets saturated. limiter: pipe 1 config bw 4294Mb queue 3000 codel target 5ms interval 100ms ecn sched 1 config pipe 1 type fq_codel target 5ms interval 100ms quantum 1514 limit 10240 flows 1024 ecn pipe 2 config bw 4294Mb queue 3000 codel target 5ms I have a suspicion that its FQ_CODEL related, but thas just a suspicion. For you 6 Mbps you would need to set around 5. Codel, fq_Codel, and Cake are all a bit aggressive in this because they're meant to handle egress instead of ingress. I know that there is an old topic, but i'm trying to do the same setup. "? I think its ok as I dont run "ALTQ" as per manual but Im not 100% sure. Latency would gradually increase although the configured limits would be maintained. I've also watched the video that rpotter28 linked which is very informative about codel/fq_codel, but I've not actually found it to be needed that often. The instructions I followed for the limiter setup are these originally posted in the large FQ-Codel thread: Are there any FQ_codel guides available how to setup FQ_codel properly regardless what is my internet connection speed. Steps to reproduce on pfSense: fresh pfSense CE 2. Updated over 6 years ago. 5, i. I have a gigabit line, and have resorted to using the LAN graphs which are accurate as a result. My WAN is a passthrough IXGBE nic port and the LAN is an IXGBEVF IXVF. Most recommendations are to FQ_CODEL target 5ms interval 100ms quantum 1514 limit 10240 flows 1024 NoECN Children flowsets: 10002 10001 10000 10001: 290. Hi, I have been using pfSense for a couple of months now. 0/0 7 470 0 0 0 00002: 20. I have a Pfsense is on Hyper-V. The post I linked to above is written by one of the individuals that actually implemented FQ-CoDel in FreeBSD and he confirms in that post what we found through experimenting. My principal beef with the implementation is that it doesn't get framing right, but aside from that it seems to work pretty well. Had issues with limiters fq_codel (will post in the relevent thread later) but got around them. Ping is 3ms. 4. For more advanced understanding I also recommend watching the youtube video Comprehensive Guide to pfSense 2. Per below two forum posts by dummynet creator configuring Codel AQM and fq_codel scheduler, as shown in Youtube video, does not really make sense. The name is short for Controlled Delay and is pronounced "coddle". I have an Intel x520-T2 which uses the IXGBE and IXGBEVF drivers. 4 and fq_codel? Until I removed the suricata package my connection would keep dropping and I had lots of issues. Updated 9 months ago and useful that it does not make much sense that we would throttle it with FQ_CODEL or that any meaningful benefit would be gained in doing so. 4" thread. 0/0 0 I'm not using a MikroTik product, however I had problems with fq_codel on another firewall (pfSense). 3. 0/0 0. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 10001 weight 0 lmax 0 pri The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based You’ve got FQ_CODEL and now dummynet is integrated directly to pf on FreeBSD and pfsense, )but not opn). Scheduler: FQ_CODEL (target: 5, interval 100, quantum 1514, limit 10240, flows 1024) Queue: QMA: Tail Drop Anyway, I had Bandwidth set to 940 Mbps for download and upload. Now we need to add a queue to that It’s super simple and in general if you’re doing anything latency dependant I’d highly advise implementing some kind of FQ_CoDel. target and interval are both 0, and quantum, limit, and flows are blank. 1Gb symmetric. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp 0 ip 0. Granted it had to be hacked on but it worked! Has anyone been running Suricata with 2. The FQ_CODEL limiter scheduler can help alleviate the effects of Bufferbloat. 000 Mbit/s 0 ms burst 0 q131073 50 sl. 7. Install the iperf package in pfSense and start it as the server with the default settings. Does anyone know the equivalent of "Queue Length" of pfsense in Opnsense? If you use FQ_C, there are 3 queue lengths that can be set up, however one of them does nothing, and second can not be set from GUI cause OPNsense doesnt have the option. I also have rate limits targetting one device which is a bandwidth hog, and that works great. The originally described scenario works fine on current snapshots for me. Instead, use the advanced options when editing or creating a Pipe, and select FlowQueue-Codel for the scheduler. With the standard settings of the FQ_CoDel Sceduler : The amazing thing is that with FQ_Codel I always had problems with the download latency never going down, The CoDel Active Queue Management (AQM) discipline was recently added to pfSense 2. When setting bandwidth limits within pFsense and then testing, it appears that the small bandwidth reduction required to ensure the limiter operates correctly has already been calculate (e. Can I turn off "Enable the ALTQ support for hn NICs. And isnt in my use case. Would you mind sharing screenshots with your setup? fq_codel_enqueue usually appears when your queue is full its referencing to FQ-CoDel limit in the Shaper > Pipe if I am not wrong (at least this is what I was seeing when playing with that setting) It did appear as well on previous versions in the log. cwagz @guardian. 1Gbit/s+), consider increasing further to 3000-5000 If fq_codel makes things better and simplifies shaping settings then I give it +1 to be implemented in pfSense. Essentially just if the delay exceeds a certain amount of ms. And even limiting my downstream to 25% (i. 0 flows (256 buckets) sched 1 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail mask: 0x00 0x000000ff/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 sched 1 type FQ_CODEL flags 0x1 256 buckets 4 active FQ_CODEL target 5ms interval 30ms quantum 300 limit 1000 flows 1024 ECN mask: 0x00 0xffffff00/0x0000 -> Syslog fills with these when my WAN download is at or close to maximum load: Apr 11 19:21:37 kernel fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 422 Apr 11 19:21:37 kernel fq_codel_enqueue over limit Apr 11 19:21:37 kernel fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 422 Apr 11 19:21:37 kernel fq_codel_enqueue over limit Apr 11 19:21:37 kernel fq_codel_enqueue maxidx = 422 Apr 11 > Unfortunately PFsense doesn't support fair queue codel, just the older version, so while it's better than it was before I still get some spikes and issues when the upload pipe gets close to Configuring CoDel Limiters for Bufferbloat. I've limited LAN to 95% of my WAN (150/10), and limited Guest to 10% of that. Here is an overview of the FQ_CoDel algorithm that Scheduler – FQ_CODEL (Note: You can set the value of the “quantum” parameter to 300 if you want to give priority to Voice over IP (VoIP) traffic. My cable router is switched to bridge mode and a pfsense is connected behind it. Now we need to add a queue to that limiter before The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. After seeing a few threads on how to configure fq_codel / fq codel, I eventually figured out the right settings (I wouldn't say perfect) that will get myself an A on the bufferbloat report. ) Add "In" queue. For very high speed WANs (e. WAN) Set the Scheduler Type to CODEL. Here's how mine is set up: Firewall > Traffic Shaper > Limiters > New Limiter After seeing a few threads on how to configure fq_codel / fq codel, I eventually figured out the right settings (I wouldn't say perfect) that will get myself an A on the bufferbloat Queue Management Algorithm: CoDel; Scheduler: FQ_CODEL; Queue length: 1000; ECN: checked; Advanced. Leave everything at their default values; Click Save to create the limiter. 100Mbps on a 400Mbps connection) does not help. iso Restored a backup config from 2. The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. Patches for new AQMs CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE were submitted to CURRENT a few months ago and are now in 10-STABLE and 11. 4, it was in the hangout video which it instructs to choose Codel as the AQM. Each uses droptail as queue management algorithm, and FQ_CODEL as scheduler, limited to 25 Mbit/s. First post . (TLS/SSL + User Auth) I have a suspicion that its FQ_CODEL related, but thas just a suspicion. 5. 6 limiters created (1 up, 1 down for each of 3 ISPs), each with a child queue. In pfSense software, shaper rules are mostly handled on the Floating tab using the Match action that assigns the traffic into queues, but rules on any interface can FQ-CoDel quantum should be set at your WAN MTU (in my case, 1514 bytes) FQ-CoDel limit doesn't really need messed with, this setting defines the maximum number of packets that CAN be queued. Set an appropriate value for Bandwidth. Netgate appears to be doing it right. After a lot of research and trial and error, I initially addressed the issue with the ALTQ FAIRQ scheduler and Codel AQM in pfSense, but eventually just switched to fq_codel as support was added in later pfSense versions. 000 Mbit/s 0 ms burst 0 q75541 50 sl. Pushing less pps through pfSense seems to net fewer dropped echo replies. 1 -p 5201). I am personally very graphically untalented, but very responsive to good graphs. For example Download limiter: 100Mbits (my connection rate) The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. What does not work as expected is applying the Limiter via a pass rule on LAN with a gateway set; a policy routing rule. Current CoDel uses ALTQ but these implementations use dummynet. FQ_CODEL On: 935 download / 600 to 500 upload. FQ-CoDel is managing its own internal queues. @dtaht this is why I was stating codel+fq-codel - when I first learned about FQ-CoDel being added to pfSense 2. 01 limiters using the fq_pie scheduler no longer pass any traffic. I run fq_codel with taildrop on a 3. Now I'm getting results that look like this pretty consistently: pfSense 2. It took me a while to figure out that I had to limit the bandwidth to ~85% of the published line speed (50Mbps), so i set it to limit around 45Mbps. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 2 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail sched 2 type FQ_CODEL flags 0x0 0 buckets 1 active FQ_CODEL target 5ms interval 100ms quantum 300 limit 10240 flows 20480 ECN Children flowsets: 2 0 ip 0. I still use fq_codel today although on a now faster 1Gbit symmetric fiber connection - even at high WAN speeds bufferbloat That you don't have to hit the box codel or set a mask on fq_codel makes perfect sense. Bufferbloat adıda verilen internet gecikmelerinde sorunumuzu çözecek olan işlemleri Pfsense üzerinde yapacağız ve sonrasında paket dağılımları Akıllı Kuyruk Yönetimi (SQM) ile şişmelere, gecikmelere It does work in pfSense CE 2. Added by qubit nano over 8 years ago. Queue Management Algorithm: CoDel; Scheduler: FQ_CODEL; Queue length: 1000; ECN: checked; Advanced. The eero 6 hardware offload of fq_codel works nowhere near as well as the eero 5’s cake implementation did. The idea is that download is different from upload in that the cost of transferring the data has already happened, making it undesirable to drop packets. We can continue on forums to avoid spamming here, Tested fq-codel out on the latest snapshot and found out that if i apply an outbound WAN pass rule to ipv6 it does apply and Recently set up pfSense on an ESXi host. Installing VMware Tools, disabling offloading (default), enabling passthrough, and setting latency sensitivity to high had no effect at all. 0 flows (1 buckets) sched 10005 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail sched 10005 type FQ_CODEL flags 0x0 0 buckets 0 active I have a guest Network that I've set basic limiters on and I also want to limit the LAN so fq_codel on pfSense will queue my traffic instead of my ISP. Use another VM as the iperf client pointed at the pfSense LAN's IP address for the iperf server (iperf3 -c 192. While everything seemed to be fine the fq_codel limiter did not work properly. I know that I didn't have this problem in the past, using the same Queue Management Algorithm – CoDel Scheduler – FQ_CODEL (Note: You can set the value of the “quantum” parameter to 300 if you want to give priority to Voice over IP (VoIP) traffic. I've set up limiters and rules as noted here: 1. The Linux kernel has had mainline fq_codel since 3. The same rules and limiters worked fine under 22. CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE AQMs. Developed and maintained by Netgate®. At line (native) rate cake uses more cpu than fq_codel does. Flow Queueing with Controlled Delay. e. Click Save. Added by mrpops2ko . Traffic Shaper (ALTQ) Target version:-Start date: FQ_CODEL. This issue can be repeated across installs. Selamlar arkadaşlar bu yazımda sizlere PFSense üzerinde Traffic Shaper yardımıyla FQ_Codel uygulacağız ve izlenecek olan adımları anlatacağım. I have PFSense virtualised and I also make use of an Intel X520-T2 as well as make use of VMWare ESXi + using SR-IOV on the nic, FQ_CODEL does not do a good job of this, and PRIOQ would be a much welcomed addition, if I could get some assistance on how to accomplish it. @pfsvrb said in fq_codel Traffic Shaping with WiFi:. That is; Limiters applied via a floating outbound match rule on WAN, with or without a gateway set. I prefer to use Codel for my queue, and eventually fq_codel whenever it makes it into PFSense. But the console of the OPNsense is full of messages, The only real change I can think of is that I had to switch to VirtIO whereas with pfSense I The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. Default installation from 2. Added by qubit nano almost 8 years ago. when we have a WAN link that speedtests at 105 Mbit/s and we set it at 100 Mbit/s in the limiter, we get ~96 Mbit/s) - is this inherent within FQ_CoDel Is there an easy way of configuring Vyos with a simple QOS policy using fq-codel like there is with PFSense, { bandwidth 100% burst 15k queue-type fq-codel } description "17Mb/s with FQ_CODEL WAN OUT" } shaper shape-94mbit { bandwidth 94mbit Hi just wanted to ask a Few things, Will adaptive qos receive an option to choose qos alogrithm, when will it use or does it use fq-codel and if so will it be upgraded to use cake-FQ-Codel, if not is it possible to allow for choosing which algrithim is used, and can it be added in a future firmware update. But if you don't drop/mark packets, you can't signal upstream to back-off. Call quality remains excellent during a 5 minute rrul test. I would not lower the QoS limit because then multiple devices on your network will all bottleneck at that imposed limit. I have been troubleshooting fq_codel since early 2. The correct configuration should have AQM set to Tail Drop on both, limiter (pipe) and child I run a pfsense VM on Proxmox (7) and I pass as "vtnet"/virtio 2x SFP+ (710 Intel) nic (not passthrough). for quite a while now, so I'm guessing UBNT has made it the default queuing discipline in the Linux-based USG firmware. I receive a WAN IPv4 and a WAN IPv6 address from the provider in dual-stack mode. Troubleshooting Traffic Shaping. Queue Length: Can vary depending on the speed of the link, but 1000 should be a safe default for most high speed WANs (100Mbit/s). ) Create "In" limiter. FQ_CODEL will be in the next release expected soon. FQ_CODEL target 5ms interval 100ms quantum 1514 limit 10240 flows 1024 ECN Children flowsets: 10001 10003 10005: 19. pfSense has the following defaults: quantum: 300 limit: 10240 flows: 20480 But the RFC indicates that those should be different: quantum: 1514 (possibly 64k with TSO) limit: ~Mbps (but not less than 300) flows: 1024 (this is the linux default) . FQ_CODEL Off: I'm not sure how helpful this will be, but I've got two separate locations both on 1Gbit/s FiOS circuits running pfSense 22. The correct configuration should have AQM set to Tail Drop on both, limiter (pipe) and child The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and pipe 1 config bw 94Mb droptail sched 1 config pipe 1 type fq_codel target 5ms interval 100ms quantum 1514 limit 10240 flows 1024 ecn queue 1 config pipe 1 mask dst-ip6 /128 dst-ip 0xffffffff codel target 5ms interval 100ms ecn pipe 2 config bw 17Mb droptail root@PFSENSE home # ipfw sched show 00001: 69. Now i'm having issues with my restored OpenVPN server. w0w. The CPU goes to around 4% max. Just did a clean install of the latest pfSense-CE-2. How to apply a Traffic Shaper (fq_codel) to Wireguard Interface Group? Unfortunately with only 20Mbps of Upload and how the NBN works here in Australia, a WireGuard client can The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. I'm also running fq_codel limiters but have tried altq too. dummynet. How To Solve pfsense Bufferbloat With A CodelQ / FQ_Codel Limiter (tagalog) PFSENSE Config: FQ_CODEL Traffic shaping (Limit Drop) on both down and up DNS over TLS DHCP PFBLOCKERNG (500k list so far) Only thing I havent tested yet is VPN which I know would probably be brutal. The CoDel algorithm and bufferbloat are discussed in the ALTQ chapter at CoDel Active Queue You’ve got FQ_CODEL and now dummynet is integrated directly to pf on FreeBSD and pfsense, )but not opn). C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0. 2. I use an arbitrarily large queue depth with Codel, like 4096, because it already fights buffer bloat. Having said that I set up an pfSense CE 2. That should be all you need beyond specialist use cases. I can run an rrul test across pfSense, placing all traffic, except for ICMP, in the 90Mbit in/out FQ-CoDel limiter queues and I place a call during the test. 6 pfSense. The first issue I encountered was, of course, bufferbloat. in fact the inverse is very There are two types of Codel queuing options, and this can be very confusing. The text boxes are empty and don't contain any greyed-out text, indicating that no default value is being used. If ever you have a chance to give this a go again, to revisit and re-use your first tail drop diagram in contrast with codel alone - codel drops from the head of the queue, not the tail, and I would perhaps draw a 5ms target window Got this setup! Thank you so much! I have been waiting for a way to run FQ_Codel on my pfsense box for a while now. Child queues use droptail as the queue management algorithm. When creating new limiters as per the documentation, the parameters are no longer set to default values as was done in previous versions of pfSense. 9 months ago. In addition, if your pfSense firewall is not constrained by memory, you can change the value of the “limit” parameter to 20480, and the value of “flows” parameter to 65535. Copy link #6. Upload ramps up quickly to the 800s but then drops slowly down to the 500s to 600 mbps range. We have spent a lot of time hashing this out in the "Playing with fq_codel in 2. ) Create "Out" limiter. 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0. I set up CoDel limiters using this guide: After setting up the fq_codel i can see the improvements for bufferbloat, no doubt about it. 6. The highest supported bw value and type in pfSense is 4294 Mbit/s which results in the following /tmp/rules. 05 I had almost standard fq_codel configuration for my 600/30 Mbps connection: And each time I run bufferbloat test I got something like the one below before each tests I restarted pfsense (it doesn't change anything for the results but I wanted to be sure that I doing it properly) After updating to 23. With CODEL and FQ_CODEL I am getting 300mbps upload. pfSense getting fq_codel and wireguard would let me move entirely to pfSense / BSD on the networking side :) 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0. All 6 limiters are identical for testing purposes. Most recommendations are to drop this value significantly, thus, causing the console flood messages. ) Add "Out" queue. - FQ_codel is a way that it automatically makes queues out of flows. So far so good. It performs just as good as Linux's fq_codel that I have running on LEDE, IPFire and a few other boxes. 0-DEVELOPMENT-amd64-20190322-1846. ip. CPU with all the above hits 50% max during speed tests. dslreports used to give me bad scores until I implemented fq-codel on pfsense. Status: CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE AQMs. Actions. The documentation says Target should be 5-10% of Interval so the defaults being 100 interval and 5 target. C. I have wondered the same as well (if you look up a few posts I shared some thoughts on this based on my current understanding of Dummynet and Limiters). FQ_Codel as the scheduler/queue manager seems to really help with overly aggressive limiting. In reality you care only about the queue length defined by FQ_C which is limit. Updated almost 6 years ago. 4 (or the dev version which is available now but potentially buggy), you can get FQ_Codel started. Select an interface (e. 2-RELEASE. This post is being created to for those who do not want to sift through forum threads and have the right info in one place to get this working. Feedback on pfSense® software Configuration Recipes — Configuring CoDel Limiters for Bufferbloat. io_fast="0" forced all traffic into io_pkt instead of io_pkt_fast for me in pfSense. No issues at either site. 246 Mbit/s 0 ms burst 0 q00001 500 sl. N. The wizard was created when one could reliably depend on traffic being confined to a few ports. cake has a few advancements over fq_codel, but fq_codel is usually good enough for most applications. The mix of TailDrop/Fq_CoDel is quite useful for large IP ranges (have several blocks of IPv4 and a heavy utilisation of a /48 (numerous /64's)). fq_codel for pfsense has a really long thread attached to it on the forums that I've lost track of. Repeat as needed for all other active WAN-type interface(s) Fair Queuing (FAIRQ)¶ I was looking my codel/fq_codel diagnostic information (Diagnostics → Limiter Info): Limiters: 00001: 4. I'm now using the official Patches for new AQMs CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE were submitted to CURRENT a few months ago and are now in 10-STABLE and 11. Last post . And using FQ_CoDel or WF2Q+. And that codel+fq_codel makes no sense (even though it does work) The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. Anyone here have more experience with tuning FQ_CoDel limiters? I just finished tuning it but I don't know if I will experience strange issues as the parameters I had to set to eliminate bufferbloat seem way out of spec. Using latest snapshot as of today. It ensures that packets from small flows are sent in a timely fashion, while large flows share the bottleneck’s capacity. At line (native) rate cake uses more cpu One AQM is FQ_CoDel e. W. It was designed to combat some of the problems associated with bufferbloat in networking infrastructure. . (1 buckets) sched 1 weight 0 lmax 0 pri 0 droptail sched 1 type FQ_CODEL flags 0x0 0 buckets 0 active FQ_CODEL target 5ms interval 100ms quantum 300 limit 10240 flows 1024 NoECN Children flowsets: The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. When I need VPN I run it on my clients. last edited by . Limiters applied as floating MATCH traffic rules. 2 VM on a Proxmox server and can reproduce it. 000 Mbit/s 0 ms burst 0 q75537 50 sl. I've discovered that I get better results (less buffer bloat) by leaving the Enable Codel box UNCHECKED. Never higher. 1. pfSense has flows set to twice the limit that may be a good heuristic. g. Subject changed from nat + a limiter + fq_codel dropping near all ping traffic under load to Ping packet loss under load when using limiters; Status changed Enable FQ_CODEL and forget about it. It's lengthy but informative. The page will display FQ_CODEL options and their default values after saving this limiter, but leave them at defaults. I have since removed the network switch and have been playing with pfsense using CODEL and FQ_CODEL. Nullity. When using the same floating firewall rules if i change to fq_codel traffic flows as normal. Once you get 2. I have my FQ Codel limit set at the highest wired-speed that my internet connection can sustain and still get consistent A scores on buffer bloat tests. I followed the instructions in the slides from the August 2018 hangout to configure the CoDel/FQ_CODEL limiter, and it works, but shouldnt the firewall float If a separate floating match rule is created for ICMP, then packets will not be dropped. 05. nfrwua nxaz oqygk ieoxxvo owtwv bojtpktl mxqwqt bdcuym cpk urqdyhvlt fstnnnyv rzrfcl vgytz mgj riwsf