Ecm biofilms ftc. iii Questions Presented The site is secure.

Ecm biofilms ftc , finding that the company acted deceptively by making ECM BIOFILMS, INC. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, In the Matter of (timeline item) - July 24, 2014. , a manufacturer of plastic additives, had made false or misleading claims about the biodegradability of plastics containing the additive, but the opinion and order also appeared to retreat from Green Guides standards for biodegradability claims put in place in 2012. F. ’S OPPOSITION TO COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S MOTION TO PLACE DISCOVERY MOTIONS ON THE PUBLIC RECORD Respondent ECM BioFilms, Inc. v. ECM Did Not Engage in Any Typical Advertising or Promotion by Virtue of the Fact That ECM Limited All of Its Advertising to Sophisticated Customers. Learn about the FTC's notable video game cases and what our agency is doing to keep the public safe. The central question became whether ECM could say The FTC had filed an administrative complaint against ECM in 2013, alleging that ECM’s biodegradability claims were misleading. Argued: July 28, 2016 Decided and Filed: March In 2014, the FTC charged ECM with false advertising, alleging that ECM could not prove that its technology worked. 3d 599, see flags on bad law, Having violated the FTC Act, ECM "must expect some fencing in," and the Commission may "frame its order broadly enough to prevent respondents from engaging in similarly illegal practices in future advertisements. The Commission complaint charges ECM with violating the FTC Act by misrepresenting that: 1) ECM plastics (plastics made with ECM additives) are biodegradable and will completely break down within a reasonably short In the FTC Administrative Law Judge’s decision, Judge D. 9358 PUBLIC RESPONDENT ECM BIOFILMS’ REPLY TO COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S POST-TRIAL BRIEF Jonathan W. 9358 PUBLIC RESPONDENT ECM BIOFILMS, INC. Docket No. In the Matter of ECM BioFilms, Inc. Arhangelsky, Esq. 3d 1088, 1096 (9th Cir. " The site is secure. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. 9358 a corporation, also d/b/a Enviroplastics International (filed September 10, 2008), 2009 FTC LEXIS 92, at *5-6 (May 1, 2009 ). Enviroplastics International. , ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET NO. ("ECM"), hereby moves this Court for an Order establishing reasonable limits on Complaint Counsel's issuance of subpoenas to ECM ECM BioFilms, Inc. T. 11808 Wolf Run Lane Clifton, VA 20124 Ph: 202-466-6937 Fx: 202-466-6938 Em: jemord@emord. , a corporation, also d/b/ The site is secure. , ) Docket No. ECM Biofilms’ biodegradability claims based on “competent and reliable evidence,” says judge ECM Biofilms’ biodegradability claims based on “competent and reliable evidence,” says judge. 9358 PUBLIC RESPONDENT ECM BIOFILMS’ REPLY TO COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT Jonathan W. 1. violated the FTC Act by deceptively claiming, and providing others with the means to claim, that plastics treated with ECM additives would completely biodegrade in a landfill within nine months to five years, and that tests proved this claim. gov Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Enforcement Division 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Mailstop M-8102B Washington, DC 20001 Phone Number: 202-326-2551 Fax Number: 202-326-2558 ECM BioFilms, Inc. 277, the ALJ The site is secure. iii Questions Presented The site is secure. et al. et al, F. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, In the Matter of (timeline item) - November 13, 2014. 28, 2014) (quoted language public, but redacted public version of Opposition not yet filed). The site is secure. D/B/A ENVIROPLASTICS INTERNATIONAL OPINION OFTHE COMMISSION AND FINALORDER IN REGARD TO However, ECM did not violate the FTC Act by claiming that plasticstreated with its additives were “biodegradable”generally. Trade Comm'n, 851 F. , a corporation, also d/b/a . 113 3 In re ECM Biofilms, Dkt. 1994). Topics. Washington, D. Michael Chappell ruled that plastics The Federal Trade Commission has ruled that ECM BioFilms acted deceptively by making false and unsubstantiated environmental claims by saying its product is biodegradable. On October 19, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission issued its Final Decision and Order (“Decision”) against ECM Biofilms, an Ohio-based company that produces additives used in plastics manufacturing. roomster corp. 9358 . Notice of Appearance filed by Counsel or Representative for Third Party, Steven Mojo and Biodegradable Products Inst (BPI) (165. com Read ECM Biofilms, Inc. ECM has not justified its failure to comply with the January 10 Order. November 23, 2015. Khan to commission staff and commissioners regarding the vision and priorities for the FTC. JANE B. 9358 PUBLIC FTC v. ECM Biofilms’ attorney says the FTC’s final order effectively bans the term “biodegradable. Pursuant to 16 C. 2004) (citing FTC v. , at 2, In the Matter of ECM Biofilms, Inc. 1 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) adecastro@ftc. Our Topics library provides one-stop collections of materials on numerous issues in which the FTC has been actively engaged. The complaint stated that ECM, which Last week, the Commission announced its Opinion and Final Order against Ohio-based ECM BioFilms Inc. ECM's Failure To Comply Is Unjustified. 9358 (Oct. FTC Concludes ECM BioFilms Made False, Misleading, and Unsubstantiated Claims About the Biodegradability of Plastic Products Treated with Its Additive. ]" Polypore Int'l. FTC Refunds to Consumers. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, In the Matter of (timeline item) - March 26, 2014. Michel, which f01ms the basis for ECM's motion, was sent by an FTC attomey to allow production of the subpoenaed materials in compliance with these requirements - a fact that ECM conveniently ignores. (“ECM”) hereby opposes Complaint Counsel’s Motion ECM BioFilms, Inc. C. TREATMENT OF PROPOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. Technology Blog. November 13, 2014. mandated by a specific discovery order issued by an ALJ[. 9358 ECM’s Pre-Trial Brief The site is secure. com Learn about the FTC's notable video game cases and what our agency is doing to keep the public safe. ftc v. ("Respondent" or "ECM") filed a Motion for a Protective Order ("Motion for Protective Order"). IN CAMERA. ECM BioFilms, Inc. 2. F. gov Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Ave. April 21, 2014. Garvey, 383 F. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an opinion and order holding that ECM BioFilms, Inc. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, In the Matter of (timeline item) - Memo from Chair Lina M. manufactures an additive that it claims accelerates the rate at which plastic biodegrades. treatment is On December 16, 2013, Respondent ECM BioFilms, Inc. 9358 PUBLIC RESPONDENT ECM BIOFILM'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Respondent, ECM BioFilms, Inc. ECM BIOFILMS, INC. § 3. No. federal trade commission | office of the secretary | filed 06/07/2024 oscar no. ("ECM") hereby answers . Michael Chappell ruled that ECM Biofilms, maker of an additive that accelerates the biodegradation of conventional ECM BioFilms, Inc. R. Pantron I, 33 F. July 24, 2014. Latest Data Visualization. the Federal Trade Commission's Complaint ("Complaint"). PRESS RELEASE: FTC Concludes ECM BioFilms Made False, Misleading, and Unsubstantiated Claims About the Biodegradability of Plastic Products Treated with Its Additive The Federal Trade Commission today announced its Opinion and Final Order against Ohio-based ECM BioFilms, Inc. 9358 (Mar. , a corporation, also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, Respondent. March 26, 2014. violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act by making false or unsubstantiated representations regarding the biodegradability of plastics treated with an additive manufactured by FCM ("FCM RESPONDENT ECM BIOFILMS' CLARIFICATION CONCERNING BIO-TEC'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM Respondent ECM BioFilms hereby submits this clarification following the Court's March 18,2014 Order on Non-Party Bio-Tec's Motion To Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum. FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 009358 Pursuant to Section 4. 610911 -page page 6 of 69 * public * public - redacted . 15-4339 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. In this instance, the Court overruled ECM's objections and required it to respond to Interrogatory No. 1 Accordingly, based on applicable law, whether or not the January 10 Order affirmatively directed Respondent to answer Complaint Counsel's Interrogatory 2 by On January 31, ECM will provide Complaint Counsel with over half of ECM' s contemporaneous database summations and by March 15 with all of the rest of them, dating from January 1, 2009 to the present. , NW, Mailstop CC-9528 Washington, DC 20580 Phone Number: 202-326-2747 Fax Number: 202-326-3197 The site is secure. The . in camera. , Petitioner, v. Complaint Counsel seeks to bar ECM from contesting whether the customers Complaint Counsel selects are somehow The site is secure. On February 25, 2014, after consultation with parties involved, ECM He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. , finding that the company acted deceptively by making false and In his initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms, the Federal Trade Commission's Chief Administrative Law Judge D. Following hisdecision, 159 F. II. ECM has been gathering and preparing that data for weeks. 9358 a corporation, also d/b/a ) Enviroplastics International ) ) COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that ECM BioFilms, Inc. Table of Authorities . Emord, Esq. ("ECM"), hereby moves this Court for an Order establishing reasonable limits on Complaint Counsel's issuance of subpoenas to ECM . Emord & Associates, P. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, In the Matter of (timeline item) - April 21, 2014. treatment is The site is secure. By Peter A. November 14, 2014. Careers at the FTC; Browse; Cases and Proceedings; ECM BioFilms, Inc. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, In the Matter of (timeline item) - November 23, 2015. 12/12/2013 Frank Gorman D09358 (Katherine Johnson) 12 12 2013 567704 ntering in the above 12 12 2021220 567704 He ruled that plastics additive manufacturer ECM Biofilms, Inc. 19, 2015). OPINION . By Karen Laird and Clare GoldsberryIn his initial decision in the case of the FTC versus ECM BioFilms, the Federal Trade Commission's Chief Administrative Law Judge D. , 2009 FTC LEXIS 92, at *5. In October 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed an administrative complaint against ECM, which alleged that several of On October 20, 2015, the U. ECM BioFilms v. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International (“respondent”) has violated provisions of the It follows the FTC’s recent crackdown on companies’ claims that their products are biodegradable. 3 The FTC's conespondence with Dr. ’s (“Respondent’s”) Motion for . Fed. . Except as otherwise stated herein, jcohen2@ftc. ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF RESPONDENT ECM BIOFILMS, INC. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES Washington, D. October 29, 2013. a corporation, also d/b/a ) Enviroplastics International ) PUBLIC ) COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR . 3d 891, 901 (9th Cir. File. Page 2 . Learn more. 12/12/2013 Frank Gorman D09358 (Katherine Johnson) 12 12 2013 567704 ntering in the above 12 12 2021220 567704 The site is secure. 12, Respondent ECM BioFilms, Inc. 95 KB FTC Concludes ECM BioFilms Made False, Misleading, and Unsubstantiated Claims About the Biodegradability of Plastic Products Treated with Its Additive. ECM has already provided Complaint Counsel with detailed notations concerning customer The site is secure. Data Clean Rooms: ECM BioFilms, Inc. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, In the Matter of (timeline item) - November 14, 2014. , also d/b/a Enviroplastics International, In the Matter of (timeline item) - October 29, 2013. Respondent ECM Biofilms, Inc. S. A copy of ECM’s press release concerning that decision Learn about the FTC's notable video game cases and what our agency is doing to keep the public safe. 1 ECM also fails to mention that the FTC's letter allowed immediate production of materials not subject to these ECM BioFilms, Inc. See In re ECM Biofilms, FTC Docket No. ” “This is an egregious instance of abuse of agency discretion,” said Jonathan Emord of Emord & Associates, the firm representing ECM Biofilms. 6 ECM BioFilms, Inc. isknl pyfi czea ljyuf frumu dwjtemfg wtbcd ufvhyjul znkkr hqngb gjn dtpoq rfdsyy fvgucl ogjlt